home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: mail2news.demon.co.uk!genesis.demon.co.uk
- From: Lawrence Kirby <fred@genesis.demon.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.lang.asm.x86,comp.lang.c,comp.os.msdos.programmer
- Subject: Re: FREEDOS: did someone see it? (was Re: ANNOUNCE: New Free-DOS
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 96 01:06:42 GMT
- Organization: none
- Message-ID: <823828002snz@genesis.demon.co.uk>
- References: <3jkaun$8rn@2hoog.vpro.nl> <3k8iue$1ncb@rs6a.wln.com> <4enb2g$711@spruce.citicorp.com> <621WV-sfN1B@oscar.north.de> <4evol1$lla@dfw.nkn.net> <4f8a2s$sgq@natasha.rmii.com> <4f8qbt$n9q@globe.indirect.com>
- Reply-To: fred@genesis.demon.co.uk
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: genesis.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.27
- X-Mail2News-Path: genesis.demon.co.uk
-
- In article <4f8qbt$n9q@globe.indirect.com>
- raster@indirect.com "Charles Dye" writes:
-
- >Windows NT: perfectly correct. Xenix: I don't know how much is Microsoft's
- >and how much is SCO's.
-
- Microsoft developed Xenix originally and then sold (transferred or whatever
- the deal was - Microsoft still owns a notable amount of SCO stock) it to
- SCO. Up until their most recent Unix release The standard SCO C compiler
- was Microsoft based. I'd better stop before I flame myself for being
- off-topic! :-)
-
- --
- -----------------------------------------
- Lawrence Kirby | fred@genesis.demon.co.uk
- Wilts, England | 70734.126@compuserve.com
- -----------------------------------------
-